Orthology / Synteny Evidence

Inspect cross-reference orthology and synteny-block evidence.

TkA01G624900 LXL04_000258 JCVI_TKOH_00001 Gene ID Converter

Evidence boundary: TK1151 and OH-1004 are different materials of the same species. This page shows ortholog and synteny ID correspondence between two reference genomes, not a same-cultivar genome-version upgrade. Blocks are based on DIAMOND RBH plus coordinate-order anchors and can be further refined by MCScanX/JCVI. JCVI_TKOH_ block IDs are also accepted.

Global Block Summary

Synteny blocks

427

ID converter records

84884

High confidence

302

Medium confidence

125

Material	Assembly	Genes	Gap runs	Telomere scan
TK1151	`TK1151_GWHBCHF00000000`	45224	1917	0/9
OH-1004	`OH1004_GCA_047496595.1`	40057	131	0/711

Query Interpretation

Input ID

JCVI_TKOH_00266

Query type

Block ID

Crosswalk plus synteny evidence

Resolved gene

None

No rubber dandelion gene was resolved

Linked evidence

0 / 1 / 19

crosswalk / blocks / anchors

Best block: JCVI_TKOH_00266

The query resolves to a synteny-block ID. Block span and anchor genes are shown first.

Gene ID Converter Download current result

Linear Synteny View

The best synteny block for the current query is shown as a linear ribbon.

JCVI_TKOH_00266 Chr06 10733627-11025980 Chr05 117334427-117690135 mixed High 19 anchors

High Medium Other Only the first 12 anchors are drawn

The anchor table is paginated; TSV contains all anchors for the current query. The ribbon shows only a partial linear backbone of the current block.

Current Query Evidence

No ID correspondence record is available for the current query.

Synteny Evidence

Block	Query location	Target location	Orientation	Current mapped anchors	Confidence	Note
`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	Chr06:10733627-11025980	Chr05:117334427-117690135	mixed	19	High	Formal JCVI synteny block from rebuilt ID map pipeline.

Block Anchor Genes

Total anchors: 19 · Showing 1–19 · Page 1/1

Download All Anchors TSV

TkA06G039750 → LXL04_025854

76.2%

TkA06G039810 → LXL04_025853

100.0%

TkA06G039830 → LXL04_025853

93.8%

TkA06G039900 → LXL04_025852

100.0%

TkA06G039920 → LXL04_025851

46.1%

TkA06G039930 → LXL04_025849

95.2%

TkA06G039940 → LXL04_025848

93.0%

TkA06G039990 → LXL04_025846

99.7%

TkA06G040090 → LXL04_025842

64.1%

TkA06G040130 → LXL04_025841

99.8%

TkA06G040140 → LXL04_025841

100.0%

TkA06G040160 → LXL04_025840

99.9%

TK1151 gene	OH-1004 gene	Block	Identity	Coverage	Confidence
`TkA06G039750`	`LXL04_025854`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	76.2	98.696 / 69.846	Complex
`TkA06G039810`	`LXL04_025853`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	100.0	11.94 / 5.634	Complex
`TkA06G039830`	`LXL04_025853`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	93.8	100.0 / 40.053	Review
`TkA06G039900`	`LXL04_025852`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	100.0	100.0 / 100.0	Strict
`TkA06G039920`	`LXL04_025851`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	46.1	100.0 / 94.07	Complex
`TkA06G039930`	`LXL04_025849`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	95.2	64.615 / 83.444	Complex
`TkA06G039940`	`LXL04_025848`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	93.0	100.0 / 94.273	Probable
`TkA06G039990`	`LXL04_025846`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	99.7	100.0 / 100.0	Complex
`TkA06G040090`	`LXL04_025842`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	64.1	100.0 / 100.0	Complex
`TkA06G040130`	`LXL04_025841`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	99.8	100.0 / 53.173	Review
`TkA06G040140`	`LXL04_025841`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	100.0	100.0 / 22.429	Review
`TkA06G040160`	`LXL04_025840`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	99.9	100.0 / 100.0	Strict
`TkA06G040170`	`LXL04_025839`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	100.0	100.0 / 100.0	Complex
`TkA06G040180`	`LXL04_025838`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	100.0	96.907 / 54.493	Review
`TkA06G040240`	`LXL04_025835`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	89.3	100.0 / 92.484	Complex
`TkA06G040460`	`LXL04_025834`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	100.0	100.0 / 100.0	Complex
`TkA06G040470`	`LXL04_025832`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	94.2	98.646 / 67.874	Review
`TkA06G040480`	`LXL04_025832`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	96.5	80.427 / 27.295	Complex
`TkA06G040750`	`LXL04_025830`	`JCVI_TKOH_00266`	99.8	100.0 / 100.0	Strict