Orthology / Synteny Evidence

Inspect cross-reference orthology and synteny-block evidence.

TkA01G624900 LXL04_000258 JCVI_TKOH_00001 Gene ID Converter

Evidence boundary: TK1151 and OH-1004 are different materials of the same species. This page shows ortholog and synteny ID correspondence between two reference genomes, not a same-cultivar genome-version upgrade. Blocks are based on DIAMOND RBH plus coordinate-order anchors and can be further refined by MCScanX/JCVI. JCVI_TKOH_ block IDs are also accepted.

Global Block Summary

Synteny blocks

427

ID converter records

84884

High confidence

302

Medium confidence

125

Material	Assembly	Genes	Gap runs	Telomere scan
TK1151	`TK1151_GWHBCHF00000000`	45224	1917	0/9
OH-1004	`OH1004_GCA_047496595.1`	40057	131	0/711

Query Interpretation

Input ID

JCVI_TKOH_00008

Query type

Block ID

Crosswalk plus synteny evidence

Resolved gene

None

No rubber dandelion gene was resolved

Linked evidence

0 / 1 / 21

crosswalk / blocks / anchors

Best block: JCVI_TKOH_00008

The query resolves to a synteny-block ID. Block span and anchor genes are shown first.

Gene ID Converter Download current result

Linear Synteny View

The best synteny block for the current query is shown as a linear ribbon.

JCVI_TKOH_00008 Chr01 22364561-23170740 Chr01 154081740-154482436 mixed High 21 anchors

High Medium Other Only the first 12 anchors are drawn

The anchor table is paginated; TSV contains all anchors for the current query. The ribbon shows only a partial linear backbone of the current block.

Current Query Evidence

No ID correspondence record is available for the current query.

Synteny Evidence

Block	Query location	Target location	Orientation	Current mapped anchors	Confidence	Note
`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	Chr01:22364561-23170740	Chr01:154081740-154482436	mixed	21	High	Formal JCVI synteny block from rebuilt ID map pipeline.

Block Anchor Genes

Total anchors: 21 · Showing 1–21 · Page 1/1

Download All Anchors TSV

TkA01G087830 → LXL04_005072

93.3%

TkA01G087980 → LXL04_005073

94.5%

TkA01G087990 → LXL04_005077

42.2%

TkA01G088300 → LXL04_005084

95.0%

TkA01G088380 → LXL04_005084

98.8%

TkA01G088390 → LXL04_005082

61.1%

TkA01G088400 → LXL04_005082

98.6%

TkA01G088410 → LXL04_005080

64.1%

TkA01G088420 → LXL04_005079

99.7%

TkA01G088610 → LXL04_005085

97.0%

TkA01G088970 → LXL04_005089

96.8%

TkA01G089390 → LXL04_005094

79.7%

TK1151 gene	OH-1004 gene	Block	Identity	Coverage	Confidence
`TkA01G087830`	`LXL04_005072`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	93.3	100.0 / 100.0	Complex
`TkA01G087980`	`LXL04_005073`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	94.5	99.593 / 99.593	Complex
`TkA01G087990`	`LXL04_005077`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	42.2	100.0 / 84.099	Complex
`TkA01G088300`	`LXL04_005084`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	95.0	100.0 / 35.159	Review
`TkA01G088380`	`LXL04_005084`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	98.8	97.17 / 90.813	Strict
`TkA01G088390`	`LXL04_005082`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	61.1	96.893 / 80.823	Review
`TkA01G088400`	`LXL04_005082`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	98.6	95.172 / 10.714	Review
`TkA01G088410`	`LXL04_005080`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	64.1	95.68 / 84.375	Complex
`TkA01G088420`	`LXL04_005079`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	99.7	98.196 / 76.815	Probable
`TkA01G088610`	`LXL04_005085`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	97.0	100.0 / 100.0	Review
`TkA01G088970`	`LXL04_005089`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	96.8	95.445 / 42.252	Review
`TkA01G089390`	`LXL04_005094`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	79.7	100.0 / 15.397	Complex
`TkA01G089410`	`LXL04_005094`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	99.0	100.0 / 36.795	Review
`TkA01G089460`	`LXL04_005095`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	96.5	100.0 / 100.0	Strict
`TkA01G089490`	`LXL04_005096`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	93.6	100.0 / 100.0	Probable
`TkA01G089610`	`LXL04_005097`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	96.0	93.396 / 24.49	Review
`TkA01G089830`	`LXL04_005067`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	72.4	100.0 / 100.0	Review
`TkA01G090080`	`LXL04_005069`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	98.6	60.397 / 96.919	Review
`TkA01G090320`	`LXL04_005070`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	99.2	100.0 / 100.0	Strict
`TkA01G090390`	`LXL04_005071`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	98.6	100.0 / 100.0	Strict
`TkA01G091420`	`LXL04_005072`	`JCVI_TKOH_00008`	94.1	100.0 / 100.0	Complex